I've had a love hate relationship with this lens since the day I got it 4 years ago. Its been back to Nikon twice, once because it seized up and the second time to recalibrate. It was giving results where the edges were sharp
the horizon was sharp but the centre middle distance were often soft. Which made it for me unpredictable and highly frustrating. Anyway Nikon offered to sort it out as it may have been reassembled incorrectly. One of the issues with this lens is field curvature which can make focusing a real challenge, a hair turn either way can make a difference.
The cropped images are from jpegs straight out the camera unsharpened.
the horizon was sharp but the centre middle distance were often soft. Which made it for me unpredictable and highly frustrating. Anyway Nikon offered to sort it out as it may have been reassembled incorrectly. One of the issues with this lens is field curvature which can make focusing a real challenge, a hair turn either way can make a difference.
The cropped images are from jpegs straight out the camera unsharpened.
So the results are a bit of a mixed bag which is a shame because at its best its brilliant. In the last shot the lens sings in the centre but the edges scream. Is this out of focus due to field curvature and a more limited depth of field? If I'd used a smaller aperture or tried refocusing would the results have been better... probably. But you would think with a 24mm lens focusing and depth of field would never be an issue.
The first 2 images would make perfectly good prints to at least 18 x 12 the last image would show its weakness at 10 x 8.
The first 2 images would make perfectly good prints to at least 18 x 12 the last image would show its weakness at 10 x 8.